Re: Announcing Veil

Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> With only one known request for a user-allocated lock, it's hard to
>> justify the overhead of a GUC variable.

> True, but are people going to recompile PostgreSQL to use this feature?
> Seems they would have to.

How you figure that?  The proposed default value was 4, which seems
fine to me, given that the known worldwide demand amounts to 1.
        regards, tom lane