Re: advisory locks and permissions

Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> An admin who is concerned about this can revoke public access on the
>> functions for himself ... but should that be the default out-of-the-box
>> configuration?  I feel more comfortable with saying "you have to turn
>> on this potentially-dangerous feature" than with saying you have to turn
>> it off.

> I agree with having it turned off by default, at least in 8.2.

Do we have a consensus to do this for 8.2?  Or are we going to leave it
as is?  Those are the only two realistic short-term options ...
        regards, tom lane