Version Numbering

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David E. Wheeler
Тема Version Numbering
Дата
Msg-id 28F10824-222F-44C0-8A96-42FC8B1DCA35@kineticode.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Version Numbering  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Re: Version Numbering  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Version Numbering  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hackers,

A while ago, I asked if .0 releases could be versioned with three digits instead of two. That is, it would be "8.4.0"
insteadof "8.4". This is to make the format consistent with maintenance releases ("8.4.1", etc.). I thought this was
generallyagreed upon, but maybe not, because I just went to build the latest 9.0 beta and saw that the version number
is"9.0beta4". 

Would it be possible to *always* use three integers? So the next release would be "9.0.0beta5" or "9.0.0rc1"? In
additionto being more consistent, it also means that PostgreSQL would be adhering to Semantic Versioning
(http://semver.org/),which is a very simple format that's internally consistent. I'm planning to require semantic
versioningfor PGXN, and it'd be nice if the core could do the same thing (it will make it nicer for specifying
dependencieson core contrib modules, for example). 

Thanks,

David

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: git: uh-oh
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Parallel pg_restore versus dependencies