Re: extensible enum types

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David E. Wheeler
Тема Re: extensible enum types
Дата
Msg-id 28C0DDCD-59F6-476E-8769-BE68E4B70BED@kineticode.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: extensible enum types  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Ответы Re: extensible enum types  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Jun 18, 2010, at 9:34 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:

> I'd be perfectly happy to hear a reasonable alternative. Assuming we use some integer representation, given two
labelsrepresented by n and n+1, we can't add a label between them without rewriting the tables that use the type,
whetherit's my representation scheme or some other. Maybe we could have a FORCE option which would rewrite if
necessary.

People would likely always use it.

Why not use a decimal number?

Best,

David

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "David E. Wheeler"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: extensible enum types
Следующее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: extensible enum types