Re: pgsql: Address portability issues in bfe16d1a5 test output.

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2016-09-12 21:33:03 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> It looks like making your tables temp would work around it ...

> Right. But the more general question about the value of that test
> remain.  Not that the tables in this test matter given how simple they
> are, but in general it doesn't hurt to have objects survive the
> regression tests, to increase dump coverage.

> Shouldn't we just drop that test?

Fair question --- it's not immediately obvious what that tests
that isn't covered at least as well by the adjacent tests.
The git history isn't much help: all of that came in in one big
commit from Tom Lockhart.

            regards, tom lane