Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 01:08, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> If anything, I'd like to see us *add* the older versions to the newer
>> notices when relevant. �We want people to realize that these holes exist
>> and are unfixed in old branches, not think they're secure.
> Agreed. However, moving them to a separate page and put a prominent
> note saying "security advisories for no-longer supported releases are
> archived here" or something like that seems like a reasonable
> compromise.
Sure, that'd be fine.
regards, tom lane