Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
>> Given the minor symptoms in released versions, I lean against a back-patch.
> FWIW, I'd lean toward a back-patch. It's probably not a big deal
> either way, but I have a hard time seeing what risk we're avoiding by
> not back-patching, and it seems potentially confusing to leave
> known-wrong logic floating around in older branches.
I agree with Robert. This is a bug, let's fix it.
regards, tom lane