Re: SQL/JSON: functions

Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 11:54:11AM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> I will deal with the structural issues soon.

> I didn't actually intend this as a complaint.  The ability for a reference to
> be specific and granular is good.  So there may be reasons to change the
> structure, but my comment is only about a +0.1.

I was going to complain about it on the grounds that it looks
approximately nothing like other sections of func.sgml.  The layout
of the rest of that file is hard-won presentation knowledge and
should not be lightly ignored.

            regards, tom lane