Re: SIGPIPE handling

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: SIGPIPE handling
Дата
Msg-id 28913.1069005187@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: SIGPIPE handling  (Kurt Roeckx <Q@ping.be>)
Список pgsql-patches
Kurt Roeckx <Q@ping.be> writes:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2003 at 06:28:06PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>> Is there a reason we don't make use of the MSG_NOSIGNAL flag to
>> send()?  Or is the problem in case of SSL?

> Oh, seems to be a Linux only thing?

That and the SSL problem.  I wouldn't object to implementing it as a
platform-specific optimization if we could get it to handle the SSL
case, but without SSL support I think it's too limited.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Andrew Dunstan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SRA Win32 sync() code
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SIGPIPE handling