Re: Need efficient way to do comparison with NULL as an option

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Need efficient way to do comparison with NULL as an option
Дата
Msg-id 28896.1199512773@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Need efficient way to do comparison with NULL as an option  ("D. Dante Lorenso" <dante@lorenso.com>)
Список pgsql-general
"D. Dante Lorenso" <dante@lorenso.com> writes:
> Here's what I'm doing, tell me if I'm crazy:

> The column I'm comparing to is 'folder_id'.  The folder_id column is a
> foreign key to a folder table.  If folder_id is NULL, the row is not in
> a folder.

Yup, you're crazy.  The best interpretation of NULL according to the SQL
spec is that you don't know which folder the row is in.

If you are willing to reserve ID 0 as not being any real folder, then
folder_id = 0 would be a reasonable way to represent "it's not in a
folder".  This is positive knowledge, entirely distinct from "I don't
know if it's in a folder, much less which one".

Now there is a small problem with that, which is that if you want to
have folder_id be a foreign key to a table of folders then it doesn't
work so well.  But do not let yourself be tempted to use NULL as a
solution to that.  What I'd suggest after a few seconds' thought is that
you create an explicit "unclassified" folder and put every "not in a
folder" row into the "unclassified" folder.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Need efficient way to do comparison with NULL as an option
Следующее
От: Bill Moran
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: large table vacuum issues