Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload
Дата
Msg-id 28853.1131821704@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
>> I was hoping to avoid forcing source-code changes, but something like
>> that might be the best solution.  Anyone think it's unreasonable?

> Alternativly, you could make it optional for a release (print warning
> that magic block wasn't found). Next release require it.

What's the point of waiting?  We'd be forcing people to add it sooner
or later, so why not sooner?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Martijn van Oosterhout
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: SIGSEGV taken on 8.1 during dump/reload
Следующее
От: Michael Fuhr
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Cursor estimated row count