Re: PG_GETARG_GISTENTRY?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PG_GETARG_GISTENTRY? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 28827.1491423143@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: PG_GETARG_GISTENTRY? (Mark Dilger <hornschnorter@gmail.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Mark Dilger <hornschnorter@gmail.com> writes:
> I have written a patch to fix these macro definitions across src/ and contrib/.
> Find the patch, attached. All regression tests pass on my Mac laptop.
Thanks for doing the legwork on that. This seems a bit late for v10,
especially since it's only cosmetic, but please put it in the first
v11 commitfest.
> I don't find any inappropriate uses of _P where _PP would be called for. I do,
> however, notice that some datatypes' functions are written to use PG_GETARG_*_P
> where PG_GETARG_*_PP might be more efficient.
Yeah. I think Noah did some work in that direction already, but I don't
believe he claimed to have caught everything. Feel free to push further.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: