Re: PostgreSQL12 crash bug report
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PostgreSQL12 crash bug report |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 28807.1564614449@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: PostgreSQL12 crash bug report (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: PostgreSQL12 crash bug report
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
I wrote:
> yi huang <yi.codeplayer@gmail.com> writes:
>> [ crashes with ]
>> $ pgbench -h 127.0.0.1 -p 5432 -U exchange exchange -T 2 -c 4 -f /tmp/test.sql
> As per the stack trace, we're trying to build a new tuple for the output
> of a ValuesScan node, but the targetlist for that seems completely insane:
After digging through this, it seems clear that it's the fault of
ad0bda5d2, specifically this code in EvalPlanQualSlot:
*slot = ExecAllocTableSlot(&epqstate->estate->es_tupleTable,
epqstate->origslot->tts_tupleDescriptor,
&TTSOpsVirtual);
It's setting up an es_epqTupleSlot[] entry on the assumption that it
should have the same tupdesc as the output tuple that's to be rechecked.
This might accidentally fail to malfunction in single-table cases,
but it's quite broken for any join case --- in particular, for the
given test case, the scan tuple for the VALUES node surely doesn't have
the same tupdesc as the join result.
I think we need to change the API of EvalPlanQualSlot, because it
cannot determine the correct tupdesc when it's not handed a Relation.
I'm not entirely sure that its immediate callers can either :-( so
this might propagate out a ways. Or perhaps we should move the
slot-making someplace else.
I'll go make an open item for this.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: