Marko Kreen <markokr@gmail.com> writes:
> - In attempt to preserve maximum range of values for INT64_IS_BUSTED
> systems, the code is written rather non-obvious way.
I do not personally object a bit to making the units comparisons
case-insensitive (I think it's mainly Peter who wants to be strict
about it). I don't think there are any other good ideas in this
patch, however, and exposing ourselves to intermediate overflows in
the name of simplicity is definitely not one.
regards, tom lane