David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 11:44:06AM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> I think it's good to include the table name, for sure. I *think* I
>> agree that it isn't necessary to include the child names.
> Would this affect the use case of breaking up a too-long table into
> partitions?
> WITH f AS (
> DELETE FROM ONLY foo
> WHERE foo_ts >= '2011-01-01' AND foo_ts < '2011-02-01'
> RETURNING *
> )
> INSERT INTO foo_201101
> SELECT * FROM f;
In that example, each ModifyTable node is constrained to a single
target table, so I'm not sure what your point is.
regards, tom lane