Re: Not an error but a difficult wording
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Not an error but a difficult wording |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2873117.1674697141@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Not an error but a difficult wording (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Not an error but a difficult wording
|
| Список | pgsql-docs |
Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at> writes:
> On Wed, 2023-01-25 at 08:22 +0000, PG Doc comments form wrote:
>> Maybe this would be better? (I don't know the comma rules)
>> "because the files(,?) that are generated/processed by these tools(,?) are
>> already included in the tarball"
> +1
> Correct English would be:
> These tools are not needed to build from a distribution tarball, because
> the files generated by these tools are included in the tarball.
The existing wording is not incorrect AFAICS, but I agree it's a bit
awkward. I'd modify one word in your version:
These tools are not needed to build from a distribution tarball, because
the files generated using these tools are included in the tarball.
Or possibly "with" instead of "using"?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: