Re: [HACKERS] Re: RE: JDBC now needs updates for lar ge objects

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Re: RE: JDBC now needs updates for lar ge objects
Дата
Msg-id 28695.972489045@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Список pgsql-interfaces
Magnus Hagander <mha@sollentuna.net> writes:
> Perhaps a good long-term solution for this would be to support
> INFORMATION_SCHEMA per SQL92? This requires basic schema support, of course
> :-)

Yes, I think that's the right answer in the long run.  Won't happen for
a release or three though...
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-interfaces по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Tony Simopoulos"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: signals in ODBC?