Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?
Дата
Msg-id 28691.1032992879@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> I already have a TODO item:
>     * Return proper effected tuple count from complex commands [return]
> I am unsure if it will be fixed in 7.3 or not.  It is still on the open
> items list, and I think we have a general plan to fix it.

I got distracted and wasn't following the thread a few days ago about
the topic.  Did people come to a consensus about how it should work?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bug in PL/pgSQL GET DIAGNOSTICS?