Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu> writes:
> But I think I agree that it's surprising that the collate clause isn't
> working in the ORDER BY on a column produced by a UNION. Certainly
> that's where people usually want to put it.
See this ancient comment in transformSetOperationStmt:
* For now, we don't support resjunk sort clauses on the output of a * setOperation tree --- you can only use the
SQL92-specoptions of * selecting an output column by name or number. Enforce by checking that *
transformSortClausedoesn't add any items to tlist.
Perhaps sometime we ought to make an effort to relax that.
regards, tom lane