Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> * Tom Lane (tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
>> As far as that last goes, we *did* get the buildfarm fixed to be all
>> v11 scripts, so I thought we were ready to move forward on trying
>> 09f08930f again. It's too late to consider that for v13, but
>> perhaps it'd be reasonable to change the SCRAM default now? Not sure.
> I feel like it is. I'm not even sure that I agree that it's really too
> late to consider 09f08930f considering that's it's a pretty minor code
> change and the up-side to that is having reasonable defaults out of the
> box, as it were, something we have *long* been derided for.
Well, the argument against changing right now is that it would invalidate
portability testing done against beta1, which users would be justifiably
upset about.
I'm +1 for changing both of these things as soon as we branch for v14,
but I feel like it's a bit late for v13. If we aren't feature-frozen
now, when will we be?
regards, tom lane