Re: [HACKERS] -T option ignored?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] -T option ignored?
Дата
Msg-id 28667.925480585@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на -T option ignored?  (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes:
> It seems that postgres does not accept -T option. Checking the source,
> I found that T is not given to getopt() while there is a code to parse
> the -T option. Is there any reason for this?

Looks like a garden-variety oversight from here.  While you're fixing
it, I suggest making the order of the getopt() list match the order of
the entries in the big switch statement; the postmaster does it that
way, and that made it a whole lot easier to see that things matched...
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Vadim Mikheev
Дата:
Сообщение: can't compile
Следующее
От: "Charles C. Bennett, Jr."
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Webpage