Re: Three-byte Unicode characters

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Three-byte Unicode characters
Дата
Msg-id 28616.1113149786@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Three-byte Unicode characters  (Peter Eisentraut)
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <> writes:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> So, we do have a bug, and we are probably going to need to fix it in
>> 8.0.X.

> This has never worked in all the years we have had Unicode 
> functionality, so I don't understand why we have to rush to fix it now.  
> Certainly, it ought to be fixed, but not in a minor release.

The reasons why we rejected applying John's patch at the tail end
of the 8.0 cycle are still valid: it is a new feature and there
is nontrivial risk of introducing new bugs (more specifically,
exposing bits of the system that aren't prepared for more-than-16-bit
characters).

I'm fine with changing it in the 8.1 cycle, but I think a back-patch
would be folly. 
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Ramy M. Hassan"
Дата:
Сообщение: static genericcostestimate
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Unicode problems on IRC