Re: Re: Better way of dealing with pgstat wait timeout during buildfarm runs?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Re: Better way of dealing with pgstat wait timeout during buildfarm runs? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 28560.1421687101@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Re: Better way of dealing with pgstat wait timeout during buildfarm runs? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Re: Better way of dealing with pgstat wait timeout
during buildfarm runs?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
>> Sure, but the log isn't invisible. As mentioned one paragraph above, I
>> don't think it's likely to ever be noticed in the client code in the
>> cases where it happens in production.
> Yes, that is my feeling as well.
Meh. I still don't like it, but I guess I'm outvoted. Unless there are
further votes, what we have at this point is just:
- elog(WARNING, "pgstat wait timeout");
+ ereport(LOG, (errmsg("using stale statistics instead of current ones because stats collector is not
responding")));
with no conditionality for pgstat_vacuum_stat vs. other callers.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: