Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 2847014.1611971629@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node?
Re: Should we make Bitmapsets a kind of Node? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 4:01 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> We do still have x86 in the buildfarm, as well as some other
>> 32-bit platforms, so I don't agree that it's that much less
>> tested than non-mainstream 64-bit platforms.
> I don't know anybody that still runs Postgres
> (or anything like it) on a 32-bit platform. I think that Michael
> Paquier owns a Raspberry Pi zero, but that hardly counts.
Hmph ... three of my five buildfarm animals are 32-bit, plus I
have got 32-bit OSes for my Raspberry Pi ;-). Admittedly, none
of those represent hardware someone would put a serious database
on today. But in terms of testing diversity, I think they're
a lot more credible than thirty-one flavors of Linux on x86_64.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: