Re: Application name patch - v2
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Application name patch - v2 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 28467.1256138748@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Application name patch - v2 (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Application name patch - v2
Re: Application name patch - v2 |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> FWIW, I would prefer PGAPPNAME to PGAPPLICATIONNAME which is what
> We don't usually use abbreviations, so how about PGCLIENTNAME or some such?
Not sure I believe that argument. Among the set of existing libpq
environment variables I see
PGHOSTADDR
PGSSLCERT
PGSSLCRL
PGKRBSRVNAME
PGTZ
PGSYSCONFDIR
so it can hardly be said that there's a policy of avoiding
abbreviations. PGCLIENTNAME would be better than PGAPPLICATIONNAME
I guess, but I still prefer the other.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: