Re: timeout implementation issues

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: timeout implementation issues
Дата
Msg-id 28457.1018358422@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: timeout implementation issues  (Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz> writes:
>  It's good point. Why not make it more transparent? You want
>  encapsulate it to standard and current SET statement, but if it's
>  something different why not use for it different statement?

>     SET SESSION search_path TO 'something';

But a plain SET is also setting the value for the session.  What's
the difference?  Why should a user remember that he must use this
syntax for search_path, and not for any other variables (or perhaps
only one or two other ones, further down the road)?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Loftis
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: timeout implementation issues
Следующее
От: Mikhail Terekhov
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: notification: pg_notify ?