Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 2:20 AM, Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> wrote:
>> I read through this version and found nothing to change. I encourage other
>> hackers to study the patch, though. The surrounding code is challenging.
> Andres tested this and discovered that my changes to
> find_multixact_start() were far more creative than intended.
> Committed and back-patched with a trivial fix for that stupidity and a
> novel-length explanation of the changes.
So where are we on this? Are we ready to schedule a new set of
back-branch releases? If not, what issues remain to be looked at?
regards, tom lane