Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2020-May-06, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> This doesn't allow whitespace between "fall" and "through", which means
>> we generate 217 such warnings currently. Or we can just use
>> -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3, which does allow whitespace (among other
>> detritus).
> If we're OK with patching all those places, I volunteer to do so. Any
> objections? Or I can keep it at level 3, which can be done with minimal
> patching.
If we're gonna do it at all, I think we should go for the level 4
warnings. Level 3's idea of a fallthrough comment is too liberal
for my tastes...
regards, tom lane