Re: [BUGS] BUG #14862: create table with missing sequence bug
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14862: create table with missing sequence bug |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 28340.1508435193@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | [BUGS] BUG #14862: create table with missing sequence bug (gezeala@gmail.com) |
| Ответы |
Re: [BUGS] BUG #14862: create table with missing sequence bug
|
| Список | pgsql-bugs |
gezeala@gmail.com writes:
> --on a fresh db:
> CREATE SCHEMA testschema;
> --sequence is missing
> --create table fails:
> CREATE TABLE testschema.sometable1 (
> col1 bigint DEFAULT
> nextval('missingschema.missingsequence_id1'::regclass) NOT NULL,
> col2 text
> );
> --sequence is missing
> --create table works fine:
> CREATE TABLE testschema.sometable2 (
> col1 bigint DEFAULT
> nextval(('missingschema.missingsequence_id2'::text)::regclass) NOT NULL,
> col2 text
> );
> Only difference is sometable2 sequence definition has ::text::regclass.
This looks like the expected and documented behavior to me. See the
"Note" regarding early vs. late binding of sequence names at
https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/functions-sequence.html
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: