Re: Adding support for SSLKEYLOGFILE in the frontend

Jacob Champion <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> Adding the PG prefix to the envvar name addresses my collision
> concern, but I think Tom's comment upthread [1] was saying that we
> should not provide any envvar at all:

>> I think it might be safer if we only accepted it as a connection
>> parameter and not via an environment variable.

> Is the addition of the PG prefix enough to address that concern too?

Indeed, I was advocating for *no* environment variable.  The PG prefix
does not comfort me.

            regards, tom lane