Re: review: FDW API

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: review: FDW API
Дата
Msg-id 28279.1297797214@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: review: FDW API  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: review: FDW API  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> writes:
> As the patch stands, we have to do get_rel_relkind() in a couple of 
> places in parse analysis and the planner to distinguish a foreign table 
> from a regular one. As the patch stands, there's nothing in 
> RangeTblEntry (which is what we have in transformLockingClause) or 
> RelOptInfo (for set_plain_rel_pathlist) to directly distinguish them.

Hmm.  I don't have a problem with adding relkind to the planner's
RelOptInfo, but it seems to me that if parse analysis needs to know
this, you have put functionality into parse analysis that does not
belong there.

(No, I haven't read the patch...)
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: review: FDW API
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pl/python do not delete function arguments