Re: Enum proposal / design
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Enum proposal / design |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 28234.1155759223@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Enum proposal / design (Tom Dunstan <pgsql@tomd.cc>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Enum proposal / design
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Dunstan <pgsql@tomd.cc> writes:
> I thought the runtime one was kinda cute, actually, but you would have
> to have duplicate functions for the differently sized types, eg.
> enum1_out, enum2_out etc since otherwise you wouldn't know what sized
> parameter you were just handed.
I'm not sure that that matters really. What you are actually going to
get handed is a Datum that IIRC is right-justified and zero-padded, so
very probably one function would work for all stored widths. The bigger
issue I think is the surprise factor if a column gets wider over a dump
and reload.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: