Re: inefficient loop in StandbyReleaseLockList()

On 11/1/21, 10:34 AM, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Thanks for looking!  Here's an expanded patch that also takes care
> of the other two easy-to-fix cases, nodeAgg.c and llvmjit.c.
> AFAICS, llvm_release_context is like StandbyReleaseLockList
> in that we don't need to worry about whether the data structure
> is valid after an error partway through.  (Maybe we should be
> worrying, but I think the callers would need work as well if
> that's to be the standard.)

LGTM.

Nathan