Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys
Дата
Msg-id 28160.1576676326@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: unsupportable composite type partition keys  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 2:12 AM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Hm.  Seems like the restrictions here ought to be just about the same
>> as on index columns, no?

> We also need to disallow self-referencing composite type in the case
> of partitioning, because otherwise it leads to infinite recursion
> shown in my first email.

My point is basically that CheckAttributeType already covers that
issue, as well as a lot of others.  So why isn't the partitioning
code using it?

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Prabhat Sahu
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Block level parallel vacuum
Следующее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Unix-domain socket support on Windows