Re: reducing isolation tests runtime

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> I'd like to see this revived, getting a bit tired waiting longer and
> longer to see isolationtester complete.  Is it really a problem that we
> require a certain number of connections? Something on the order of 30-50
> connections ought not to be a real problem for realistic machines, and
> if it's a problem for one, they can use a serialized schedule?

The longstanding convention in the main regression tests is 20 max.
Is there a reason to be different here?

            regards, tom lane