Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include )

Peter Geoghegan <peter.geoghegan86@gmail.com> writes:
> I hope that we don't make the mistake of not checking for collisions
> with C++0x keywords, for which GCC 4.3+ has partial support. The new
> standard is almost complete, so it will probably become a lot more
> relevant soon. There are quite a few new keywords in C++0x, including:

[ shrug... ]  If it's not a keyword according to popularly available
tools, then I really have zero interest in worrying about it.  This
is an exercise in making the headers useful in practice, not in academic
standards conformance.
        regards, tom lane