Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com> writes:
> On Mon, Jan 2, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Um ... timings of what?
> Apologies for being terse, no problem to give a full explanation.
But you still didn't. I wanted to know what those numbers were and how
they show that there's not a performance regression. Presumably you
meant that some were "before" and some "after", but they were not so
labeled.
regards, tom lane