Re: [HACKERS] Regarding B-Tree Lookup
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Regarding B-Tree Lookup |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 27992.1493728167@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Regarding B-Tree Lookup (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Regarding B-Tree Lookup
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Mahi Gurram <teckymahi@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Please suggest me the easiest way to lookup into PK's B-Tree index for
>> getting TIDs.
> Why don't you just use SPI within your extension? No need to copy the
> logic for btree lookups this way.
There's not actually that much code needed, though -- basically
index_beginscan, index_rescan, index_getnext, index_endscan. One possible
model to follow is systable_beginscan and friends, in genam.c.
I think that you could possibly get away with just applying
systable_beginscan to random user tables, even. But it's at least a
conceptual mismatch, and there are some things in there, like the
test on IgnoreSystemIndexes, that you probably don't want.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: