Re: Fixing findDependentObjects()'s dependency on scan order (regressions in DROP diagnostic messages)

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2019-Feb-09, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Oh ... then why don't we go ahead and get rid of the constraint entry,
>> too?

> Because each partition has its own pg_constraint entry.  (Otherwise
> there's no place to put the column numbers into -- they can differ from
> partition to partition, remember.)  The only thing we do is mark it as
> child of the parent's one.

Uh-huh.  And what happens after DETACH PARTITION ... are you going to run
around and recreate these triggers?

            regards, tom lane