Re: track_functions default

Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> Is there a particular reason why track_functions is disabled by default?

Performance worries, plus the thought that not everyone cares to
have these stats.

> Does having it at 'pl' by default create a noticable overhead for
> people who aren't using pl functions? Or for that matter, even a
> noticable overhead for those that *are*?

I think we determined it did; and as for those who aren't using pl
functions, there'd be no benefit to such a change anyway.
        regards, tom lane