Re: [PATCH v4] Add \warn to psql
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [PATCH v4] Add \warn to psql |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 27942.1562344682@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [PATCH v4] Add \warn to psql (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [PATCH v4] Add \warn to psql
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
I wrote:
> David Fetter <david@fetter.org> writes:
>> [ v7-0001-Add-warn-to-psql.patch ]
> I took a look at this. I have no quibble with the proposed feature,
> and the implementation is certainly simple enough. But I'm unconvinced
> about the proposed test scaffolding.
I pushed this with the simplified test methodology.
While I was fooling with it I noticed that the existing code for -n
is buggy. The documentation says clearly that only the first
argument is a candidate to be -n:
If the first argument is an unquoted <literal>-n</literal> the trailing
newline is not written.
but the actual implementation allows any argument to be recognized as
-n:
regression=# \echo this -n should not be -n like this
this should not be like thisregression=#
I fixed that, but I'm wondering if we should back-patch that fix
or leave the back branches alone.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: