Re: Client application name
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Client application name |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 27924.1256136549@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Client application name (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Client application name
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes:
> Should we perhaps change the behaviour of the backend to give a
> warning only for unknown settings in the startup packet?
It's not going to help, unless you first invent a time machine so
we can retroactively cause all PG servers that are already in the field
to behave that way.
> It doesn't
> seem beyond the realms of possibility that we might want to add
> something else in the future, and this will at least mean that in a
> few releases time it might be reasonably safe to do so.
This might be a good argument for changing that going forward, but
it will be *years* before we can rely on it for anything.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: