Re: pg_settings view

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: pg_settings view
Дата
Msg-id 27912.1029028899@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pg_settings view  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Список pgsql-patches
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> For a similar reason I was thinking that only the system view should be
> documented, not the function. Is that the right thing to do?

Probably so.  Given the notational inconvenience of having to specify
the RECORD output type, I can't see much reason why people would want
to call the function directly, as opposed to selecting from the view.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Joe Conway
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_settings view
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: stand-alone composite types patch (was [HACKERS] Proposal: