Re: list rewrite committed

Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> For instance, here
>> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2004-03/msg00696.php are some
>> profiles documenting a case where nearly 40% of the runtime goes into
>> lappend's in 7.4. I haven't had time to repeat the test case but I'd think
>> that time is near-zero in CVS tip.

> Of course now ExecEvalExpr's share of runtime in that test is probably up to
> 28-35% in those tests. Or did you get to doing the things you proposed with
> making it a macro?

I did.  I'd like to re-run that test, but have no time for it right now
--- too much to do before feature freeze.
        regards, tom lane