Re: GetRelationPath() vs critical sections

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: GetRelationPath() vs critical sections
Дата
Msg-id 2787782.1740078676@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: GetRelationPath() vs critical sections  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Ответы Re: GetRelationPath() vs critical sections
Список pgsql-hackers
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> Does anybody have opinions about whether we should keep a backward compatible
> interface in place or not?

I vote for "not" --- doesn't seem like there'll be much external
code affected, and we make comparably-sized API breaks all the time.

As a matter of style, I wonder if it'd be better to have these
functions write into a caller-supplied variable.  That seems more
in keeping with most other places in Postgres, and it would save
a copying step in cases where the caller needs the result on the
heap.  I realize that returning structs has been in C for decades,
but that doesn't mean I want some of our APIs doing it one way and
some the other.

            regards, tom lane



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: