Re: Question about Idle in TX
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Question about Idle in TX |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 27857.1280864997@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Question about Idle in TX (David Kerr <dmk@mr-paradox.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Question about Idle in TX
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
David Kerr <dmk@mr-paradox.net> writes:
> for example: If a java program connects to the DB and does "begin;"
> and then internally does a "sleep 6 days"
> Does that cauz any issues other than eating a connection to the database?
In recent versions of PG, no. Before about 8.3 it was a Really Bad Idea,
because the open transaction would prevent VACUUM from reclaiming storage.
It's *still* a Really Bad Idea to begin a transaction, do something,
and then sleep 6 days. But "BEGIN" without any following commands
has been fixed to be harmless, mainly because there are so many
badly designed clients that do exactly that ...
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: