Re: ubsan

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> I think we should backpatch both, based on the reasoning in
> 46ab07ffda9d6c8e63360ded2d4568aa160a7700 ?

Yeah, I suppose.  Is anyone going to step up and run a buildfarm
member with ubsan enabled?  (I'm already checking -fsanitize=alignment
on longfin, but it seems advisable to keep that separate from
-fsanitize=undefined.)

            regards, tom lane