"Bossart, Nathan" <bossartn@amazon.com> writes:
> On 10/9/21, 10:24 AM, "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> With the (admittedly later) introduction of planner support functions,
>> it's really quite easy to do better. The attached patch adds a planner
>> support function for starts_with(), with these benefits:
> The patch looks reasonable to me.
Pushed, thanks for reviewing!
regards, tom lane