Re: Proposal: USING clause for DO statement
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Proposal: USING clause for DO statement |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 27770.1258834443@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Proposal: USING clause for DO statement (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Proposal: USING clause for DO statement
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes:
> Hypothetically - when we are able to pass any value to DO script, then
> I don't see problem. If I use Andrew's design - ${shellvar} and add it
> to psql parser, then I could to write
> \set par1 world
> do $$
> begin
> raise notice 'Helo, % and %', $1, $2;
> end;
> $$ using :par1, ${USER};
Ick. Double, triple ick. It is astonishing to me how many people think
that the solution to today's problem is always to invent some weird new
syntax to plaster over SQL. Which for some reason invariably involves
dollar signs and/or curly braces ... there isn't even any originality
involved :-(.
Maybe we should accept one of these proposals, just so that it usurps
that part of the syntax space forever and we can reject the next ten bad
ideas out-of-hand. Of course, if the SQL committee ever gets around to
defining curly braces as doing something, we'll be screwed.
colon-foo is bad enough. Let's not add more.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: