Re: FK type mismatches?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: FK type mismatches? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 27748.1062805724@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: FK type mismatches? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> Robert Treat writes:
>> In all this discussion of NOTICE vs. WARNING, can someone remind me the
>> logic for INFO? I can't seem to recall the differentiator there either.
> Info is something you request explicitly. In the past, the result for
> EXPLAIN and SHOW were sent as INFO, but now those are sent as query
> results, and there are in fact very few INFO instances left. Also, INFO
> is not affect by the log level settings.
In a severity sense I think INFO is identical to NOTICE. We invented
the category as a means of preserving the pre-existing behavior of
VACUUM VERBOSE (ie, always show the messages) when we added
client_min_messages configurability.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: